Fair Use Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am
making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission
from the copyright owner.
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am
making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission
from the copyright owner.
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
Campaign for Justice
Please tell a friend to go to
WhereToVote.com
WhereToVote.com
| BELOW ARE LINKS TO THE BRIEFS FILED BY CHRIS YOUNG. CHRIS'S MAIN POINTS IN HIS BRIEF'S ARE THAT THE STATE MAY NOT REDEFINE MARRIAGE BECAUSE MARRIAGE IS A RELIGIOUS TERM PROTECTED UNDER THE 1ST AMENDMENT, THE GOVERNMENT MAY NOT INFRINGE UPON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE COURT HAS NO STATUTORY JURISDICTION TO PERMIT SAME SEX MARRIAGE. ALSO THE LEGISLATURE MAY NOT ADDRESS THE MARRIAGE ISSUE BECAUSE IT WOULD INFRINGE UPON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM UNDER COURT PRECEDENT. THE SUPREME COURT USED MANY OF CHRIS'S ARGUMENTS IN IT'S TREMENDOUSLY JUST DECISION IN DEFENSE OF THE CONSTITUTION. It is important to note that Chris received no media coverage even though his brief had the main arguments on statutory jurisdiction. JUST CLICK EACH SEPARATE LINK BELOW! |
Chris stated, "It has been difficult for many to see why I would take this position in defense of man and
woman marriage, to those I truly hope they will read my briefs. A true leader will not be persuaded by the will
of the masses but will stand on the truth and by the founding documents of our great nation. The law is still
clear in this case. At times, although these times are surely fewer based on social injustices, the
constitutional rights of the majority need protection as well. A true leader will not be afraid to defend the truth."
woman marriage, to those I truly hope they will read my briefs. A true leader will not be persuaded by the will
of the masses but will stand on the truth and by the founding documents of our great nation. The law is still
clear in this case. At times, although these times are surely fewer based on social injustices, the
constitutional rights of the majority need protection as well. A true leader will not be afraid to defend the truth."
| Christopher Young (Democrat) |